🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 414+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage 70s outdoor jacket

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(414 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This coat was tailored made so there is no tags. The jacket is light but cozy and has plenty of pockets

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 70s outdoor jacket

This coat was tailored made so there is no tags. The jacket is light but heated and has plenty of pockets

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 543291

Category: Women > Coats & Jackets > Parkas

Original Price:$36.67 USD

Sale Price:$22 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9178 reviews

KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted
From my experience, the Vintage 70s outdoor jacket feels solid which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
50 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
simply what I wanted
So far, it fits my needs and it’s fine overall.
44 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
Feels okay after a few days use.
32 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Charlotte, NC

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
The Vintage 70s outdoor jacket is okay overall.
9 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding
The Vintage 70s outdoor jacket is effortless to clean.
15 people found this helpful