🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 646+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage owl

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(646 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$21.38
$35.63
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Double sided lucite/resin napkin or mail holder In extremely good condition No cracks or chips Hold mcm stand

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage owl

Double sided lucite/resin napkin or mail holder
In exceptionally good condition
No cracks or chips
Hold mcm stand​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1401733

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Other

Original Price:$35.63 USD

Sale Price:$21.38 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3867 reviews
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly satisfied
After a few use, the Vintage owl performs as expected so no complaints. fulfillment was normal.
33 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
After a few days, the Vintage owl does its job which is good enough.
16 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Simply extraordinary
extremely happy with the quality Vintage owl.
47 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really remarkable
The Vintage owl looks better in person.
42 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell
2 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable Vintage owl!
the Vintage owl is practical which feels reasonable.
31 people found this helpful