🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 666+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(666 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Hearts 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 with Cubic Ziconia Rhodium Plated

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5

Hearts 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 with Cubic Ziconia Rhodium Plated

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1750450

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Chain

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3724 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality​
The 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 is pleasant and light.
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic product
Honestly, it works well enough and it’s fine overall. shipment was normal.
13 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· latest York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, the 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 works fine and it works for me. Packaging was easy.
25 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
At first, the 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 feels solid which feels reasonable. Arrived on time.
9 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
supreme decision
After assorted use, it is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
1 people found this helpful