🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 794+ reviews
Vintage✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

red scarf

★★★★★4.1 out of 5(794 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$7.14
$11.9
Sale
✓ gratis dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

I got this scarf second hand and I’ve only worn it once! It’s in good condition but it holds lint extremely easily. The only flaw is a very small stain! (Which is pictured)

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

📋 Product Description

red scarf

I got this scarf second hand and I’ve only worn it once! It’s in good condition but it holds lint extremely easily. The only flaw is a very small stain! (Which is pictured)

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2041666

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Scarves

Original Price:$11.9 USD

Sale Price:$7.14 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.1
★★★★★
Based on 7724 reviews
JW
Jennifer Wilson ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Pittsburgh, PA
★★★★★
Worth every penny
The red scarf looks easy, but functionally it’s fine.
3 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · St. Louis, MO
★★★★★
Couldn't be happier
For the price, the red scarf feels solid and it meets expectations. No setup issues.
30 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · St. Louis, MO
★★★★★
treasure love love!
Happy customer. Good red scarf.
37 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · Seattle, WA
★★★★★
truly satisfied
top red scarf purchase I’ve made recently.
6 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright ✓ Verified Purchase 
11 months ago · Miami, FL
★★★★★
supreme purchase ever
To be fair, it works as described which feels reasonable.
29 people found this helpful​