🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 125+ reviews
Toys✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller 

Harry Potter Mirror Puzzle

★★★★★4.9 out of 5(125 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30​
$50
Sale
✓ gratis dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage 2001 Harry Potter mirror vision puzzle. All nine pieces are double sided and present. Overall it’s in splendid shape, but there are scratches on the mirror portion as pictured.

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

📋 Product Description

Harry Potter Mirror Puzzle

Vintage 2001 Harry Potter mirror vision puzzle. All nine pieces are double sided and present. Overall it’s in splendid shape, but there are scratches on the mirror portion as pictured.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2387101

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Puzzles

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 9097 reviews
WG
William Garcia
10 months ago · Memphis, TN
★★★★★
Worth every penny
From my experience, it is practical and it meets expectations.
33 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · Tucson, AZ
★★★★★
Exceptional quality
extremely happy with the quality Harry Potter Mirror Puzzle.
12 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller
5 months ago · San Jose, CA
★★★★★
fabulous quality
Honestly, the Harry Potter Mirror Puzzle does its job and it meets expectations.
14 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Kansas City, MO
★★★★★
Fantastic product
Good materials used in this Harry Potter Mirror Puzzle.
21 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Honolulu, HI
★★★★★
Totally worth it
Honestly, it performs as expected and it works for me.
37 people found this helpful