🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 145+ reviews
Kidsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

6-9 months vintage baby boys pants

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(145 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8
$13.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

100% cottonPreowned in superb condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

6-9 months vintage baby boys pants

100% cotton
Preowned in remarkable condition

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2543240

Category: Kids > Boys One-pieces > Boys 0-24 mos

Original Price:$13.33 USD

Sale Price:$8 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8237 reviews
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable quality
The 6-9 months vintage baby boys pants doesn’t cause any inconvenience.
40 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Packaging was uncomplicated, but the 6-9 months vintage baby boys pants itself is good.
14 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
truly happy
From my experience, it feels okay so I’m okay with it.
46 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
To be fair, the 6-9 months vintage baby boys pants feels okay so it’s acceptable.
24 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase 
2 weeks ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable 6-9 months vintage baby boys pants
After several use, the 6-9 months vintage baby boys pants works well enough which is good enough.
14 people found this helpful​